Pages

Friday, November 17, 2017

LEVEL UP


A familiar saying is, "You cannot see the forest for the trees." That is one way of saying one is too close to a problem to be able to see a possible solution, or a different means of operating. Organizational theorists encourage top level leaders to maintain a 30,000-foot perspective rather than being lost in the weeds. Maintaining a 30,000-foot perspective is difficult for pastors and other church leaders. In fact, it is difficult for leaders of any organization. I believe one of the reasons Jesus periodically withdrew from others was to regain a higher perspective on his ministry.

The immediate past president of the board of the International Coach Federation (Leda Turai Petrauskiene, MCC) points out the difference between being a local leader and a leader of an international organization. 
For many years, I served on a chapter board. Based on my personal experience and my conversations with chapter boards and ICF Members, I observed that from the local point of view, the perspective is always more homogeneous. From the boardroom, the picture tends to look more complex, because we have to take into account many factors, such as the different size and the various length of existence of chapters; different legal, economic and political factors; language issues; etc. Juggling with these numerous factors, things can never be perfect, and it is not easy to find solutions, which feel equally fair for everyone, which satisfy equally everyone’s needs and which are at the same time objective, defendable and of rigorous professional standards. Therefore, the importance of listening to each other and taking multiple perspectives in order to see the picture in its fullest cannot be overemphasized. 

If we spend our whole life in one community or congregation our perspective on "normal" becomes limited to that particular order of things. Regardless of where I have lived, I have known people who had never gone to the closest big city, nor worshipped in another congregation. Life looks so very simple from inside the cocoon of the local community or congregation. If required to step away from that which is most familiar the world can feel chaotic, complex and disorienting. It is difficult to function in the new environment.

I had such an experience in my younger years. From first grade through high school I went to the same school, and for a while, the whole school was housed in one multilevel building. My graduation class had 82 members. My first experience of higher education was a freshman year at Ohio State University with 15,000 members of that freshman class. I had been a fairly large fish in the small pond of my high school but was as small as a newly born guppy in the Ohio State University environment. I was totally overwhelmed and at the end of the year was invited not to return for my sophomore year.

Such is the experience of many people from smaller membership congregations who are chosen to serve in the more inclusive councils of the church. There are more people, more complex issues, even issues which were never dealt with or mentioned in their home congregation. Frequently they become disoriented and overwhelmed. A colleague wonders if we are asking folks to function at a higher level of Maslow's hierarchy than they are equipped to function. Another colleague speaks in game theory language of assisting people to "level up."

There is a way to help people make the transition, to level upto gain a larger perspective. It is not forcing them to climb and dive off the 10-meter diving  board. The view can be overwhelming from that height if one has never been there before. Neither is it to insist they stand at the poolside and attempt to describe what can only be seen from the 10-meter board. The ideal would be to increase the height and asking them to describe how they feel and what they see at each successive level.

According to the Urban Dictionary "leveling up" is defined as, When player of a video game has earned enough experience points to acquire a new level in a skill or skills. Often is accompanied by the ability to wield new weaponry, access new places, or begin new assignments.

Early in my ministry, I served on the Council committee which dealt with pastor/ congregation conflicts and strategic planning. The staff member for that committee frequently took me with him. At first, I merely observed. On the way home, we would debrief the meeting. He was helping me articulate my observations and what lessons I was gaining from the observation. After a while, he began giving me part of the meeting to lead. Again, on the way home, we would debrief the meeting. After some time of leveling up, the staff member put me in lead for the whole meeting with him as the observer. The debriefing of the meeting happened on the way home. Finally, he would send me out with another member of the committee. The methodology was that he worked with me to "level up," and I then worked with others to "level up" them. 

Pastors and other church leaders, who are new to their position or when facing new issues, can "level up" with effective coaching. Those newly chosen to participate in the more inclusive councils would find their service less overwhelming with coaching in their first months or year of service. 

Friday, November 3, 2017

LIBERAL AND CONSERVATIVE

    


   
Illustration used by permission www.greenberg-art.com

    Did you know that a fiscal conservative and an economic liberal are the same things? I did not either until I started doing some research. An elder in one of the congregations I served in the 80s once challenged me after worship. He said, "In light of that sermon it is obvious you have never read an economics book." I responded, holding up my Bible, "Oh, I have, but it is a different one than you are referring to." 
    I do not remember what the sermon was about. It probably had something to do with Jesus' social ethic which included the rich being responsible to alleviate the suffering of the poor. I would not be surprised if it dealt with the Lazarus and Dives story. (Luke 16:19-31) Regardless, it was obvious to him that I was a social liberal and not an economic liberal. 
    Writing on the site www.quora.comMichael Danielson states, "Fiscal conservatism generally means 'being as responsible as possible with your money,' including passing balanced budgets, paying off your debt, and not engaging in deficit spending. ... Economic liberalism, similarly, generally means 'allowing economic decisions to be made at the individual level, rather than at the group level.'" Fiscal Conservatism and Economic Liberalism More than the locus of economic decisions, economic liberalism says, "You can have whatever you can afford. If you cannot afford it, society is not responsible for providing it for you (with certain exceptions like national defense)." 
    Since the Supreme Court of the United States had ruled that corporations are individuals, by extension they are solely responsible to and for themselves. It is in their interest to keep costs, including wages, down so profit will be even higher. The concept of social responsibility plays a very, very small role in corporate ethics. "Laborers, if you want retirement income you save for it; if you want medical coverage, you pay for it; if you want a living wage, forget it." The rich get richer. The middle class vanishes. The poor barely subsist. 
    I do not know about you, but to me, that sounds like the old feudal system. Roy Orbison, in 1962, recorded the song Working for the ManIn common parlance "working for the man" means working for the government or other entity in authority in menial, oppressive conditions. It could be a slave working on a plantation, as a miner, as one laying rails, working in a sweatshop, working on a penal chain gang, or any other job providing little if any, of an opportunity for advancement. 
    Encumbered with debt, stuck in dead-end jobs, static or declining wages, increasing taxes, those in the lower and middle economic groupings have a depth of rage. Any promise of things being made better is grasped, even when not based in reality. In the mid-Appalachian region where steel mills and coal mines have all but disappeared, a promise to bring back coal rings in ears dying to hear such empty promises as something to "take to the bank." 
    The Church must call the gluttonous greed of "the man" sin of the first degree. The Church must emphasize communal, social responsibility, of caring for the "least of these." The Church must call upon the lords of government, finance and supersized corporations to improve the lives of those in the lowest rungs of the social ladder. The Church must be a conscience in a secular society. If we take Scripture seriously we must remember that in Hebrew and Greek the word righteous means justice. The demand for justice must be our clarion call