I have never understood why some people leave a congregation
declaring, “I’m not being fed.” What does that mean? Are things too challenging
and the preaching and teaching over their heads? Are the preaching and teaching
so simplistic that they do not challenge enough?
How does one understand being fed? What is the
responsibility of the person for their own feeding? Is being fed a passive or
active experience? One can be fed by a feeding tube. If a person is having ongoing and serious trouble swallowing and can't
get enough food or liquids by mouth, a feeding tube may be put directly into
the stomach through the abdominal skin. This procedure is called a percutaneous
endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG). (http://www.webmd.com/digestive-disorders/feeding-tube-placement)
A feeding tube is totally passive. The person, except for the processes in the
digestive track, is not actively involved in the process of being fed.
For John Calvin, the first mark by which we may know the
true church is Whenever we see the Word
of God purely preached and heard” (Institutes, 4.1.9), this is where the true
visible church is found. The preacher has the responsibility of presenting the
Word in the most honest and faithful way possible. It is a task not to be taken
lightly. On the other hand, hearing the preached Word is an awesome
responsibility. As the preacher has to spend effort in preparing to preach, the
congregation has a responsibility to spend effort in preparation to hear the
proclaimed word.
Have the people prepared their hearts, minds and souls to
hear the proclamation of the Word? I have seen, and experienced, the mad rush
of Sunday mornings of trying to get the children up, dressed, fed, and out the
door in time to gather for Sunday school and worship. By the time some folks
get to church their morning has been a whirlwind of activity. There has been no
time to read the Scriptures for the day, if they are known ahead of arriving,
or to center oneself in prayer. When I was a pastor, I was glad to see the
fellowship among folks before worship began. My preference was to have the
prelude after the call to worship. This was an intentional time for them to
quieten and to center themselves for worship.
Preaching and hearing the proclamation of the Word is a two-way
communication loop. There is the broadcast (speaking) and there is the
receiving (hearing). The preacher is responsible for the quality and content of
the broadcast. It has to be in a form appropriate to the congregation. The
Apostle faced that struggle. I gave you
milk, not solid food, for you were not yet ready for solid food. In fact, you
are still not ready, 1st Corinthians 3:2. Sometimes it is
necessary to “bottle feed,” or “spoon feed” the congregation.
In order to properly receive the broadcast, the ears, heart
and soul of the hears, like a radio, need to be tuned to the proper sending
station. Do they arrive in a spirit of expectation of tuning into God? Do they
expect the preacher to be the instrument through which God speaks? As the Apostle
asks, How then can they call on the One
they have not believed in? And how can they believe in the One of whom they
have not heard? And how can they hear without someone to preach? (Romans
10:14)
If one declares, “I am not being fed,” could it be they are
refusing to eat?
Thanks for this, Wayne. What some of us have thought, but were hesitatn to say so clearly.
ReplyDelete