Over the years I have observed an unspoken but very real
tension involving pastors and congregants. There are plenty of areas for there
to be tensions: politics, theology, external versus internal orientation,
chaplaincy or mission, contemporary or traditional worship, and the lists go
on. Each pastor can list their own series of tension areas. Yet, there is one
in which the pastor is caught and very well may not have the first inclination
of its reality.
For a while I thought this tension was peculiar to western
Pennsylvania. Upon reflection on other areas of the country where I have
served, I now think it is far more pervasive in the Church and across the
country. As a pastor, as a member and chair of the Committee on Ministry, and
as a General Presbyter (kind of like a Methodist District Superintendent) I
have had ample opportunity to observe this cloaked tension. Regardless of
congregational size or location this tension is not actually between the pastor
and members of the congregation, but the pastor is definitely caught in the
tension.
The tension is visible with the annual review of pastoral
compensation, or when the pastor asks permission to go on a spiritual retreat
for some decompression time. Listen in the corridors or in the parking lot and
you will hear comments about the pastor being paid too much; “we don’t get four
weeks of vacation after only a year on the job;” “I don’t get paid mileage;”
“Don’t they learn enough in seminary? Why do they need continuing education
time and funding;” “Now, the pastor wants more time off the job to gaze at
their navel.”
The tension in the life of the congregation is between those
with a labor or management mindset. There are those in the congregation with
what I call a management or owners perspective. Likewise there are those with
what I call a labor perspective. Before I go further, let me admit to using
stereotypes and not disparaging any particular people or status. Those with a
management or owners perspective tend to view the pastor as an employee. Those with
this perspective typically want the most production for the least cost and with
the least lost time. Those with a labor perspective tend to view the pastor as
upper management, and “everybody knows they are paid too much for what little
they do.”
Therefore, pastoral compensation and down time are
suppressed by each perspective. If asked nobody in a congregation would admit
to functioning from either perspective. Yet, listening to comments and
observing attitudes the hidden management/labor perspectives function in the
life of the congregation. It is possible for both perspectives to be voiced by
the same congregants depending on the situation. There are very few voices from
comparable “professionals” in the life of a congregation who will champion the cause
of the pastor.
What is a pastor to do? There is little which can be done, other than to
realize it is another of the tensions/binds which come with pastoral ministry.
Oh my. People talk about ministers in the parking lot? Say it isn't so.
ReplyDeleteInteresting observation. Made me think - while I don't like the term "Teaching Elder" anymore, for a variety of reasons, its widespread use could mitigate that tension, maybe. Presbyterians have long leaned their clergy into the values and practice of academia, and everyone knows Professors get paid to think, and even get sabbaticals.
ReplyDelete